Alligator Alcatraz or Alligator Auschwitz?
America is officially in the concentration camp business.
There’s a new detention center in the Everglades.
It’s isolated. Barbed-wired. Patrolled.
And it’s being called Alligator Auschwitz.
Is that an overreach?
Or is it a warning we’d be fools to ignore?
Let’s break it down.
What Is It?
This facility—nicknamed Alligator Alcatraz by officials, and Alligator Auschwitz by its critics—is designed to detain large numbers of immigrants, indefinitely and out of sight. It’s built in a swamp, surrounded by wildlife, wire, and watchtowers. There’s no public access. No cameras. No press.
It’s not a prison. It’s not a jail.
There are no trials. No timelines.
Just cages. Just containment.
What is a Concentration Camp?
Historically, a concentration camp is not the same as a death camp—though the two often overlap.
A concentration camp is:
A site for the mass detention of civilians—usually from marginalized, racial, ethnic, religious, or political groups—without trial or due process.
Isolated and intentionally dehumanizing.
Used to strip detainees of their rights, their identity, and often their safety.
This definition predates the Nazis. The British used concentration camps in the Boer War. And during WWII, the U.S. also, and shamefully, used them for Japanese-Americans. The purpose is always the same: isolate and control a population deemed “undesirable.”
So, yes—Alligator Alcatraz meets the basic definition of a concentration camp.
But What About Auschwitz?
Here’s the part too many forget:
Auschwitz didn’t start as a death camp.
It began in 1940 as a detention site for political prisoners.
It became a death factory only later—step by step, gate by gate.
So no, Florida’s swamp camp isn’t Auschwitz in scale or in horror.
But Auschwitz wasn’t Auschwitz at the beginning either.
And that’s the point.
The bar for outrage shouldn’t be mass extermination.
It should be the building of the system that makes mass cruelty possible.
Why the Name Sticks
It’s not just the alliteration—though Alligator Auschwitz hits hard.
It’s the echo. Because we’ve seen this movie before.
Strip people of citizenship.
Deny them lawyers.
Warehouse them in remote camps.
Justify it as “security” or “sovereignty.”
Let cruelty do the dirty work.
It’s not exactly the same. But it’s also not different enough. And that should bother everyone.
So What Do We Call It?
Call it what you want:
A human rights violation
A test balloon for authoritarian rule
A moral failure wrapped in razor wire
But don’t call it normal.
And don’t call it necessary.
The name Alligator Auschwitz isn’t meant to trivialize history.
It’s meant to prevent repeating it.
Because if we wait until the gas chambers to object, we’ve already waited too long.
And if you’re okay with this, if you support this detention facility in concept and in operation, ask yourself: What wouldn’t you be okay with? Because if alligator-guarded cages in the swamp aren’t your line, you may not have one.
✍️ If this post resonates, share it. Speak up. Subscribe. The fence is already up. Don’t let your silence be the foundation they build the next gate on.
Jon, your points all well taken. It is the step by step creeping authoritarianism and moral decline that must be stopped in its tracks. And, let's not forget about the private prison system that warehouses thousands of immigrants in well-documented and reported deplorable, understaffed, unhealthy and unsafe conditions. See the City of Leavenworth, Kansas's lawsuit to stop a private prison from reopening there.